Your Home for Toy News and Action Figure Discussion!

Forum

Notifications
Clear all

One A Day: Day #1224 - Luna Maximoff, plus Druig

Page 468 / 468

Beamish
(@beamish)
Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 1358
Topic starter  

Day #1224 - Luna Maximoff, plus Druig (Archive Day #488)

Luna Maximoff

 

Druig

 


   
ReplyQuote
(@canprime)
Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 1623
 

Luna is a pass.

Druig would be a maybe on sale.  He has some great looks over the years, but he is nowhere near the top of the Eternals list that I would want first.


   
ReplyQuote
detectivehoag
(@detectivehoag)
Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 1037
 

Double pass today.


   
ReplyQuote
PantherCult
(@panthercult)
Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 3337
 

So definitely don't need Luna -   she's not a character that adds any value to a display for me.

 

Druig I would buy.    He's not highest on the list of Eternals I want,  but I assume if a comic Druig made it into the line that would mean that Thena and Gilgamesh and some others had already been made.


   
ReplyQuote
Thor-El
(@thor-el)
Indie comics publisher, writer, and letterer
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 1522
 

I'm definitely in for Kirby costume Eternals, so he'd be a yes in either that outfit or, surprisingly, I'd go for the following JRJr. outfit as well.

Luna...I'm torn. On the one hand, as a pack-in using the baby Nathan mold with a Crystal (maybe Avengers outfit Crystal?) I'd be all for. But any other (older) version...can't say I'd be motivated to spend money on her.


   
ReplyQuote
Basil Elks
(@basil-elks)
Member with ecclectic taste in characters
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 1213
 

Both would be neat to get. 🙂


   
ReplyQuote
PantherCult
(@panthercult)
Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 3337
 

Posted by: @basil-elks

Both would be neat to get. 🙂

 

BE is this just a signature file you have stored to post in this thread every day  😉 

 


   
ReplyQuote
puckace
(@puckace)
Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 806
 

Double pass today.


   
ReplyQuote
Page 468 / 468
Share: