Ah....That makes more sense. Weird choice to base it on this instead of the live-action version of the character, but I guess they're pushing the animated show?spongyblue wrote: ↑Sat Feb 04, 2023 3:59 amI believe its from the animated show Prodigy, so it's more reflective of the animated model as opposed to the live action actress.The Gill-Man wrote: ↑Thu Feb 02, 2023 11:10 pmGotta disagree. Looks absolutely nothing like Kate Mulgrew . That is one terrible likeness on that figure...even worse than the Zuckerberg looking Data.
This is what worries me, and makes me hesitant to get too far into the line. Been burned WAY too many times with Trek lines, having incomplete crews and what-not. I mean, at this rate are we even going to get TOS or SNW figures? And, if we do, what are the odds we get a complete Bridge crew? I'd say highly unlikely, based on history.Zombie F-Body wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 2:46 amWhile I was impatiently waiting at Target for a slightly-tamed ape-child to pick his damn toy and leave the toy aisle that he, his parents on cell phones and the empty cart that they wedged sideways in the middle of the aisle were blocking, I grabbed a Saru and scanned it our of sheer boredom. Said "No location" under location and "none in back." This is not good. No stock and no set location. This will not make any money for Playmates at the rate it's going. I'm predicting we'll see wave one of Prodigy and wave 2 of the mainline will probably get canceled. Another Trek toyline soon to be dead.